Research Papers On Education Reform

  • Airini, & Brooker, B. (1999). Quality teacher education: What helps or hinders learning in teacher education. Paper presented to the Pacific Circle Consortium Annual Conference, Hawai’i, July 1999.Google Scholar

  • Airini, McNaughton, S., & Langley, J. (2006). Cooperation among universities, schools and government: Partnerships for educational reform. Paper presented at the International Conference for Teacher Education (in association with the Y2006 ICTED Secretariat), SEAMEO INNOTECH, Quezon City, Philippines, July 2006.Google Scholar

  • Airini, & Sauni, P. (2004). Bring only the most beautiful: Towards excellence in adult education pedagogy. Paper presented at the AERC/CASA. University of Victoria, Canada. August.Google Scholar

  • Alipia, T., Gill, T., Seaborne, T., Tuafuti, P., Airini., & Jesson, J. (2005). Ia Sua le Áva ae Toto le Áta: Stories from the Heart: What helps Pasifika students succeed in initial teacher education. Auckland: University of Auckland, Faculty of Education.Google Scholar

  • Alton-Lee A. (2005). Collaboration across policy, research and practice: knowledge building for sustainable educational development. Paper presented to the OECD/Netherlands Evidence Based Policy Research Conference ‘Linking Evidence to Practice’. The Hague, September. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/research/Bes/Downloads/BESOECD-ColPolicy9-09.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Alton-Lee, A. (2006). Research and evidence in educational policy-making: New challenges. Wellington: Ministry of Education. www.minedu.govt/nz/goto/bestevidencesynthesis.Google Scholar

  • Annan, B., & Robinson, V. (2005). Improving learning processes for practitioners involved in school reforms. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association conference, Montreal, Canada, April 2005.Google Scholar

  • Ashdown, J. (1994). Language problems and learning difficulties: The experiences of international students at the University of Waikato. Unpublished MA in Applied Linguistics, The University of Waikato, Hamilton.Google Scholar

  • Baker, R. (2002). Parental and community involvement in schools – opportunities and challenges for school change. Paper prepared for the International Symposium on Creation of Schools for the 21st Century. Tokyo.Google Scholar

  • Beaver B., Tuck B. (1998). The adjustment of overseas students at a tertiary institution in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 33(2): 167–179Google Scholar

  • Buly, M., & Valencia, S. (2002). Below the bar: profiles of students who fail State reading assessments. Education Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219–239.Google Scholar

  • Clifford, V. (1999). The development of autonomous learners in a University setting. Higher Education Research & Development. Vol 18(1), 115–128.Google Scholar

  • Coburn C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6): 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Codd, J.A. (1993). Equity and Choice: The paradox of New Zealand educational reform. Curriculum Studies, Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar

  • Crooks, T. & Flockton, L. (2005). Reading and speaking assessment results 2004. National Education Monitoring Report 34. Dunedin, New Zealand: Educational Assessment Research Unit.Google Scholar

  • Department of Education. (1988a). Administering for excellence: Effective administration in education (The Picot Report). Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar

  • Department of Education. (1988b). Tomorrow’s schools: The reform of educational administration in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Printer.Google Scholar

  • Doyle, W. (1990). Themes in teacher education research. In W. Houston (Ed.). Handbook of research on teacher education. (pp. 3–24). NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar

  • Durie, M. (2006). The secondary Futures Project. Think scenarios, rethink education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

  • Easton, B. (1997). In stormy seas: The post-war New Zealand economy. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar

  • Fitzsimons, P., & Fenwick, P. (1997). Teacher competencies and teacher education: A descriptive literature report to the Ministry of Education, New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, P. (1939). In House of Representatives. Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives (AJHR) - Education Department Annual Reports. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces – probing the depths of educational reform. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ginsburg, M., & Gorostiaga, J. (2003). Dialogue about educational research, policy, and practice: to what extent is it possible and who should be involved? In M. Ginsburg & J. Gorostiaga (Eds.). Limitations and possibilities of dialogue among researchers, policy makers and practitioners: International perspectives on the filed of education (pp. 1–36). NY: Falmer.Google Scholar

  • Hattie, J. (2003). New Zealand education snapshot. Presentation to the Knowledge Wave conference. Auckland.Google Scholar

  • Hitchiner, S. (1997). The quality assurance mechanisms in preservice teacher education: As part of the review of teacher education. Unpublished report: Susan Hitchiner, Public management consultant.Google Scholar

  • Hooks B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. NY, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

  • Lai M., McNaughton S., MacDonald S., Farry S. (2004). Profiling reading comprehension in Mangere schools: A research and development collaboration. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 27 (3): 184–197Google Scholar

  • Langley, J. P.(2002). Turning 16... what have we learned? Address to the Auckland Primary Principals Association conference. Auckland.Google Scholar

  • Langley, J. P. (2003). Onwards and upwards. Keynote address to the vision Schools conference. Auckland.Google Scholar

  • Langley, J. P. (2005). Finding strength in numbers. Feature article in the New Zealand Education Review, 10 (39).Google Scholar

  • Literacy Experts Group. (1999). Report to the Secretary of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar

  • Literacy Task Force. (1999). Report of the Literacy Task Force. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

  • McKay, J. (1999) Performance management in primary schools: A case study. Unpublished MSc thesis. University of Canterbury.Google Scholar

  • McCall, R. B., & Green, B. (2004). Beyond the methodological gold standards of behavioural research: Considerations for practice and policy. Social Policy Report. Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge away, Vol XVIII, No. II. Society for the Research in Child Development.Google Scholar

  • McNaughton, S., MacDonald, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Lai, M., & Farry, S. (2006). Replicating a process: Research-practice collaborations across two contexts. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco April 2006.Google Scholar

  • McNaughton S., Phillips G., MacDonald S. (2003). Profiling teaching and learning needs in beginning literacy instruction: The case of children in ‘low decile’ schools. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(2): 703–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, S. A. (2002). The dynamics of transformation at the Auckland College of Education 1985–2000: An analysis of the impact of socio-political and institutional change on pre-service teacher education. Unpublished PhD thesis. Massey University.Google Scholar

  • Ministry of Education. (1993). New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar

  • Ministry of Education. (1997). Quality teachers for quality learning. A review of teacher education. Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar

  • Ministry of Education. (2006). School leavers with no qualifications. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from http:www.educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/indicators/downloads/dsau3-No%20qualifications.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Nash R. (1989). “Tomorrow’s Schools”: State power and parent participation. NZJES, 24(2): 113–138Google Scholar

  • OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA. Programme for International Student Assessment. Paris OECD. www.SourceOECD.org.Google Scholar

  • Picot, B. (1988). Administering for excellence: Effective administration in education. Wellington, New Zealand: The Task Force.Google Scholar

  • Pacific Islands Tertiary Education Providers of New Zealand (2006). PITPONZ submission on developing the second Tertiary Education Strategy, 2007/12. Auckland: PITPONZ.Google Scholar

  • Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 1127). NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar

  • Ramsay, P. D. K., Sneddon, D. G., Grenfell, J., Ford, I. (1981). Tomorrow may be too late. Final report of the Schools with Special Needs Project. Education Department, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar

  • Raphael, T. E., Goldman, S. R., Au, K. H., & Hirata, S. (2006). A developmental model of the standards-based change process: A case study of school literacy reform. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 2006.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, V., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, USA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

  • Timperley, H. (2003). Shifting the focus: Achievement information for professional learning: A summary of the Sustainability of Professional Development in Literacy: Parts 1 and 2. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar

  • Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (2001). Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers’ schema. Journal of Education Change, 2, 281–300.Google Scholar

  • Yarger, S., & Smith, P. (1990). Issues in research in teacher education. In W. Houston, (Ed.). Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 25–41). NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar

  • The public education system in the United States provides education to more than 50 million students a year. This system was part of the vision of the Founding Fathers so that the American public could make educated choices about its leadership and meaningfully participate in democracy. In twenty-first-century, postindustrial society, education has become the sine qua non of preparing oneself to effectively compete in the global economy, not only as an individual, but as part of a nation as well. However, many studies find that the United States is falling behind in the international rankings in science and mathematics at important benchmark points during the education process. In response, the 1983 report “A Nation at Risk” articulated a number of ways in which the education system could be improved so that students were more competitive on a global level. However, some three decades later, indifferent progress has been made toward these goals. Far from education reform no longer being needed, it has become more important than ever before.

    Keywords Back to Basics; Education Reform; Globalization; Grade Inflation; Multiculturalism; Postindustrial; Public School; Society; Socioeconomic Status (SES); Technology

    Public Education Reform

    Overview

    The public education system in the United States is made up of about 14,000 locally governed school districts that provide education to more than 50 million students from prekindergarten through twelfth grade. In the 2009-2010 school year, this education cost $638 billion in public funds. However, the public education system of the United States stands apart not only because of its size and scope, but also because of the principles on which it was founded. Thomas Jefferson held that governments degenerate when trusted to the rulers or political leaders of the country. As a result, Jefferson advocated public education, proposing that it is necessary for citizens to improve their minds in order for democracy to work. Similarly, Benjamin Rush, another founder, stated in his "Plan for the Establishment of Public Schools" that education is favorable to liberty, promotes the ideas of laws and government, and is important to the economic well-being of the country. James Madison summarized the ideas of the Founding Fathers on public education in this way: "A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy: or, perhaps both" (as cited in Fazzaro, 2007, p. 56).

    Based on this impressive philosophy, one might reasonably assume that the public school education that one can receive in the United States would be among the best in the world. However, according to the 2011 International Mathematics and Science Study performed by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (an international organization of national research institutions and governmental research agencies), United States eighth-graders rank ninth in mathematics and tenth in science out of more than forty nations tested (U.S. Department of Education, 2011). Education in today's postindustrial society is therefore important not only to individuals who are trying to improve their socioeconomic status by learning skills that will make them more marketable in local and global marketplaces, but also to the society as a whole as it attempts to remain a world leader.

    Arguably, education reform has been around as long as education itself, as interested parties attempt to prepare citizens to lead the nation and secure its future. In recent years, however, the United States faces new challenges in reforming its education system (Andersen & Taylor, 2002). The United States is becoming an increasingly diverse society, a fact that makes the development of a public education system that will meet the needs of all its members more challenging than in the past. In addition, inequalities exist among many schools. This is due to a number of complex factors, including the fact that not every school receives equal funding. In addition, problems have arisen over the focus of education. For example, the late twentieth century saw a trend toward attempting to widen students' education by teaching them about important current issues (e.g., the environment), allowing them to learn at their own pace, or not forcing them to endure the rigors of traditional classroom discipline. Although such trends may have been well-intended, they often meant that the basics of reading, writing, and mathematics were given less emphasis in order to expand curricula. As a result, student discipline began to decline, functional illiteracy rose, and teachers were inadequately prepared to teach the basic skills necessary for students to succeed.

    Recent Education Reforms

    Redirecting Funding

    There are a number of approaches that have been taken to try to reform public education in the United States. One of the obvious ways in which to reform the education system is to reduce inequalities between schools. In the United States, this is one of the enduring problems of education reform. Funding inequalities can be observed across the nation, and also for different school districts within the same city or region. Although this might seem a simple enough problem to solve, public education is primarily funded through local property taxes. As a result, school districts in which home values are higher typically have more money for public education than do school districts where property values are lower. As a result, school districts in more prosperous communities have greater funding available to purchase textbooks, laboratory equipment, and computers that form the infrastructure for education today. Greater funding means that a school district can attract better teachers with the offer of higher salaries, and have smaller classroom sizes so that students can receive more individual attention. All these things affect the quality of education.

    However, although most people understand, at least on some level, the need for a superior education in order to maintain one's competitive edge, most people are also reluctant to pay higher taxes. In an attempt to promote public education reform, therefore, a number of states have shifted the source of funding for public education from property taxes to other sources, such as state income tax.

    Back to Basics

    Another common feature of most movements for public education reform is an increased emphasis on giving students a firm foundation in basic educational subjects. One way in which this is done is to return to an emphasis on the basics of education rather than on more politically correct or popular contemporary issues. This approach to education reform was precipitated at least in part by the 1983 report A Nation at Risk: An Imperative for Educational Reform. In this report, the National Commission on Excellence in Education concluded that the United States is no longer preeminent in commerce, industry, science, and technology, and that the edge had been gained by other countries. According to the commission's report, if this edge is not regained, Americans' culture and way of life could also be negatively impacted and could become more reliant on assistance from outside groups (e.g., advances in science and technology, access to high tech products). The report cited functional illiteracy rates, lower average achievement on most standardized tests, decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores, steady decline in science achievement, lack of higher order intellectual skills for high school juniors and seniors, and the increasing dollars spent on remedial education programs for basic skills (e.g., reading, writing, spelling, arithmetic) by the military and business in the United States.

    In the wake of the publication of A Nation at Risk, the slip of the United States in international rankings of educational excellence as cited above, and various other studies on the quality of education in America, a back-to-basics reform movement developed that placed greater emphasis on basic skills (e.g., reading, writing, spelling, arithmetic) and teaching the standards of classical literature than on other subjects and skills. In addition to placing more emphasis on teaching basic subjects, there has been a concomitant trend for more objectivity in grading at all levels, from elementary school through college. This is in reaction to accusations of grade inflation, which occurs when an excessive number of high grades are given to students or when average students who earn average scores are given above-average grades instead. Grade inflation effectively lowers the value of the top grades earned by higher-achieving students, making them less competitive in the marketplace, whether or not they have the knowledge and abilities to win top positions. The practice of grade inflation also makes lower-achieving graduates poorly prepared for the realities of college or the working world, and...

    0 Thoughts to “Research Papers On Education Reform

    Leave a comment

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *